Did you know that citizens are devastated by the destruction of family values?
Visitation after Divorce: 77% percent of Fathers are Denied in Indiana.
Did you know that over 20,000 children in Vanderburgh County are being denied visitation? Here is a report of data we collected, so that you can view the number of violations that affect individuals:
These VIOLATIONS AFFECT / EFFECT approximately
20,000 CHILDREN,
20,000 FATHERS,
10,000 STEP-MOTHERS,
40,000 Grandparents,
20,000 Step-Grandparents,
60,000 Aunts, Uncles, Cousins and Friends.
This EFFECTS 170,000 of the 180,000 Vanderburgh County CITIZENS ,
94% ALL the immediate FAMILY and Friends.
1988--US survey--77% percent of Fathers are DENIED Visitation RIGHTS in AMERICA
INDIANA USA VETERANS?
CHILDREN 550,000 20 Million N/A
FATHERS 550,000 20 Million
77% and 56% of the Population
STEP-MOTHERS 275,000 10 Million
Grandparents 1, 100,000 40 Million
Step-Grandparents 550,000 20 Million
Aunts, Uncles, Cousins 1, 650,000 60 Million
and Friends.
Total: 4, 675,000 of 6 Mil.; 170 Million of 300 Million CITIZENS
Step-mothers and Grandmothers
Speak Out and SAVE the Children
Power of Grandfathers
Partnership for Drug-Free America. (1995 Office of National Drug Control Policy)
Over 30 million grandparents are denied visitation of their grandchildren.
KNOW YOUR Parent-CHILD RIGHTS!
The US Supreme Court has UPHELD FATHER CUSTODY and EQUAL PROTECTION
1952-- May v Anderson, Parent's RIGHTS to the CUSTODY of his / her CHILDREN
345 US 528, FAR More Precious than Any Property RIGHT. 1ST Amdt
1972-- Stanley v Illinois, FATHER's has Custody RIGHTS to Illegitimate Child
405 US 645, Discrimination violates Equal Protection 14TH Amdt
1973-- Mabra v Schmidt, Fed. Court PROTECTS Visitation Association RIGHTS
356 FSup 620, Liberty, First Amendment and Equal Protection 1ST, 14TH
1978-- Quillion v Walcott, FATHER Custody LIBERTY concept
434 US 251, 5TH, 14TH
LIBERTY--For Federal Injunctive RELIEF AGAINST State JUDGES Art. VI
2000-- Bush v Gore, 531 US 98
Rule of LAW and EQUAL PROTECTION 14TH
The LOSER IS the Nation’s Confidence in the Ability of the JUDGES of the INFERIOR Courts to COMPLY with the Rule of LAW
1977-- Trainor v Hernandez, Proven Harassment...BAD FAITH prosecutions
431 US 434 Without HOPE of a VALID conviction 5TH
1984-- Lake v Speziale, RIGHT to COUNSEL 6, 14TH
580 FSup 1318, JUDGES...NOT Advise Indigent defendants of THEIR RIGHTS who faced REAL Threat of Incarceration in future proceedings.
1984-- Pulliam v Allen, 466 US 522, 5, 14TH
1983-- NO limit to Fed. Injunctive RELIEF against a State JUDGE
1984-- Pierson v Ray, US 5, 14TH even LESS support, 1983 -- would PREVENT Fed. Injunctive RELIEF
4. To EXPOSE the LIABILITY of Government / Officials
1981-- Ellis v Blum, FAILURE to PERFORM DUTY 5, 14TH
643 F.2d 68 (NY) owed Plaintiff recover DAMAGES
I.C. 31-18-1-24, -3-8
1983-- Franz v US, LIABILITY of Government / Officials
707 F.2d 582 (DC) Abduction, DENIED Visitation 1, 14TH
Ref: 1928--Montgomery vs. Crum
1928--Montgomery vs. Crum, Recover for Alienation of AFFECTION
199 Ind. 660, 161 NE 251
